|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Godfrey Silvarna
Arctic Light Inc. Arctic Light
347
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 16:24:19 -
[1] - Quote
I kinda like the sound of things, with condition it is actually well implemented in the end.
I also like the goon tears. Hearing a lot of excited murmur from smaller PvP entities.
After this, there might actually be something to shoot at when roaming in nullsec. |

Godfrey Silvarna
Arctic Light Inc. Arctic Light
347
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:11:40 -
[2] - Quote
Rowells wrote:ok this is really important, Dreads just lost half of their purpose and im willing to geuss more than half of their usage. Please tell me there are plans to change that.
E: the same might be said for supercarriers I am in the market for some cheap Naglfars.
Sell yours now! |

Godfrey Silvarna
Arctic Light Inc. Arctic Light
347
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:15:06 -
[3] - Quote
Tia Aves wrote:Only thing i'm not sure on is the 4 hour window, but I have no suggestions on how I would change it at this moment in time. Agreed. It sounds fair, since timezones are an ever-present complicating factor in international multiplayer games, but on the other hand... Not being allowed to interact with the structures of other players for 20 hours any given day is more than a little awkward.
As an upside, you can check the map for areas where the locals are likely to be ready to defend their territory at your scheduled roaming hour. |

Godfrey Silvarna
Arctic Light Inc. Arctic Light
358
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 00:49:50 -
[4] - Quote
Cr Turist wrote:Why would anyone use capitals after this patch i think is the real question. Not gonna tell you, but I do offer a fair amount of ISK for some dreads you may or may not be setting up for a firesale during this ruckus. |

Godfrey Silvarna
Arctic Light Inc. Arctic Light
361
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 12:44:38 -
[5] - Quote
Speedkermit Damo wrote:3) AFK cloaky camping needs to be dealt with once and for all. It's an utterly bullsh*t mechanic that adds nothing to the game, and will only be more prevalent with this new sov system. Why? |

Godfrey Silvarna
Arctic Light Inc. Arctic Light
370
|
Posted - 2015.03.08 22:40:13 -
[6] - Quote
Anthar Thebess wrote:CCP is moving into right direction. What i miss is smaller gate sizes. Gates that only allow cruiser or smaller ships could be solution for many current nullsec issues. Downgrading some connections to this size and creating new in this manner could be good starting point for many new groups that someday could contest others in the pursuit for sov space.
Welcome to Wormholes. |

Godfrey Silvarna
Arctic Light Inc. Arctic Light
379
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 12:40:07 -
[7] - Quote
Ugly Eric wrote:So much hate towards CCP. People crying of Fozzie nerfing everything. Yet they fail to see how much more balanced things are now than they were before. "ability to use t1 cruisers were nerfed to oblivion by jump fatigue" Honestly I find claims like that hilarious. T1 cruisers can use gates you know.
You people need to chill out. The proposed sov changes may not create the best ideal sov mechanics, but atleast it will be way better than it is now. Most of players ideas on this thread are outright useless. Though out by narrow minded ppl wanting only to buff their own way of sov living.
I agree that the proposed changes may not be the ideal situation for my way of living, but atleast it stirs the nest. If I would have it my way, it would penaltize ppl of having more sove than they can use. It would nerf lsec FW and hsec incursion incomes so much, that 0.0 would be the only feasable way of keeping your accounts plexed. The occupancy model would include pvp as it's main meter and most important meter. It would let us destroy player built stations. It would make it possible to claim lsec to nullsec and hsec to lsec (and vice versa). It would nerf the living **** out of passive alliance level income and make all income individual level. It would let the supercapitals to be docked. It would introduce more endgame content. It would give older players the edge on on their skillpoints to some usage. But hey. I cant have it my way. I have only the CCP way to play this game with. And yet I keep playing. As are all of you whiney faglets too. And most of you keep doing so. As will I.
Adapt or die. Been the keyphrase in eve for as long as this game has excisted. I hope to damn it will keep doing so. I love you Eric.
Eric4CSMXI |

Godfrey Silvarna
Arctic Light Inc. Arctic Light
380
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 22:05:27 -
[8] - Quote
NoTalent wrote:I haven't read all 187 pages of comments, so if this has been suggested then fair enough: why not make the entosis module a one time use only module. Once it has been fired, it can't be used again.
I would also make it unfittable from a mobile depot or any ship, It has to be fitted in a station. If a fleet of ceptors want to go troll sov owners as you put it, they'll have to work a bit harder at it.
I kind of like this. It would restrict the meta of fleet doctrines that would be viable, since persistent hit-an-run harassment with long range fleets would be difficult, but the restriction might be fairly small, I hope. |
|
|
|